1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

As long as authors are rewarded for publishing many articles and editors are rewarded for publishing them quickly, new ways of gaming the original publication versions will be invented quicker than new control actions could be put in place.. Charlotte J. Haug, M.D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher owned by Springer, retracted 43 articles for the same reason. How can you really fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a straightforward process. He gave journals tips for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, providing them with names and e-mail addresses. But these addresses were ones he created, so the requests to review went right to him or his co-workers.The ATS guideline, also endorsed by the AAAAI and today ACAAI, notes that FeNO tests provides valuable information to the physician that traditional medical tools cannot provide. ‘We are delighted that 3 societies have come forward in support of FeNO. ‘Several private insurance firms desired all three societies to support these guidelines which means this statement by AAAAI and ACAAI will now provide the evidence that clinicians start to see the value and want to make use of our test.